I tivo-ed the debate last night but I only ended up watching the first few minutes. Why? you may ask. Frankly it just didn’t seem like a debate at all. It seemed like each one just had their talking points that they wanted to cover and they would see which point most closely lined up with their point. I did find a pretty good analysis of the major word usage by both of them. It just confirms that they came in with their axe to grind.
Here’s the link overstated: Presidential Debate Analysis
3 Responses to The Debate
Stuff Dan Likes
This text is not inteneded to be seen. Rather, it is junk text to force themes with auto widths to extend to there full measures. This text is not inteneded to be seen. Rather, it is junk text to force themes with auto widths to extend to there full measures. This text is not inteneded to be seen. Rather, it is junk text to force themes with auto widths to extend to there full measures.
Stuff Tammy Likes
This text is not inteneded to be seen. Rather, it is junk text to force themes with auto widths to extend to there full measures. This text is not inteneded to be seen. Rather, it is junk text to force themes with auto widths to extend to there full measures. This text is not inteneded to be seen. Rather, it is junk text to force themes with auto widths to extend to there full measures.
[...] an’t stand to hear one more person talk about Michael Moore coming to UVSC or if you got bored of the presidential debates after 10 minutes, this blog may not really cage yo [...]
Here’s another interesting bit of info on how "real" the presidential debates are: Top 10 Secrets They Don
Freedom haters, that’s all we have here.